This week, hundreds of government leaders, heads of state, and business executives are gathering at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos. They will be discussing solutions to the world’s biggest risks and problems.
But everything suggests that, once more, what will not be addressed at their meeting is the biggest threat to humanity and the planet: neoliberal capitalism.
All forms of capitalism are characterised by extensive private ownership of companies as well as the primacy of the profit motive. But the specific neoliberal form of capitalism that has risen to dominance from the late 1970s onwards has additional features: the privatisation of companies previously in public ownership; a shift in power from workers to capital owners; and reduced taxes on entrepreneurs and the richest.
The transition from mixed economies under social democracies to neoliberal capitalism has led to a notable increase of wealth concentration at the top, which is now eroding (and in some places even destroying) our democracies. The absence of a sustained discussion of neoliberal capitalism in elite circles is illogical, since it is the main cause of the other problems that will be discussed at Davos.
Last week, the WEF launched its 2026 Global Risks Report, in preparation for the Davos meeting. Experts were asked to pick from a provided list the risks that they consider to be the biggest for the world. Geo-economic confrontation, misinformation and disinformation and social polarisation are regarded as the top three risks for the next two years. Over a period of 10 years, the top three are extreme weather conditions, biodiversity loss and ecosystems collapse and critical changes to Earth systems.
Inequality in income and wealth comes in seventh place. The analysis in the report presents it as the factor that is most central, as it connects most other risks. That is certainly a valid observation. However, the commentary in the report does not provide a good understanding of what the precise problem with inequality is. The WEF reduces inequality to the feelings of citizens who perceive themselves to be excluded and who are unhappy with their limited opportunities for social mobility.
Yet at its core, economic inequality is about much more fundamental issues. It is about who gets what share of what we produce together. Neoliberal ideology, with its focus on individuals and the efficiency gains of competition, makes us inclined to think that we can attribute wealth-holding to individual efforts. But this is a myth.
The economy is a complicated ecosystem of interlinked processes, in which the areas where the largest profits are made are reliant on other fields that provide the conditions for this to be possible. Without people working in the public sector for the common good, such as (often poorly paid) childcare workers, teachers and NHS doctors and nurses, there would be no productive workforce to co-create the profits of the business owners.
In recent decades the divide has widened, making capital owners even richer and workers even poorer. Taxes have also shifted from capital to labour, and the possibilities for the very richest people to pay hardly any taxes have amplified. That is what citizens are also angry about – and rightly so.
As I documented in detail in my book Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth, economic inequality is also about the increase in social, ecological and political damage caused by billionaires and centimillionaires (one whose wealth is estimated at $100m or more). But to see that, we need a system-level analysis of the fundamentals of our political economy. And unfortunately, we have no reason to believe that this will happen in Davos. As long as we dodge the question of whether neoliberal capitalism delivers what we want, and fail to take seriously the question of whether there are better systems, the world’s key problems cannot be properly understood, let alone solved.
We now also know very well what to expect if the increase in extreme wealth concentration is not tackled. In his book As Gods Among Men, the economic historian Guido Alfani writes that extreme wealth has historically been tolerated because the richest people have come to the aid of society at crucial moments, whereas now we are seeing mainly the opposite. Luke Kemp, who analyses 5,000 years of the rise and fall of civilisations in his book Goliath’s Curse, sees the same trend towards collapse emerging for global capitalism. According to Kemp, there are two paths for our future: either we will witness global societal collapse, or we will radically change the way we organise our societies. Kemp also detects economic inequality as a crucial factor in predicting societal collapse.
And it’s all happening while we stand by and watch, simply because political and economic elites are not willing to engage in an honest debate about what economic system we need.
If meetings such as the one in Davos do not even talk about capitalism, how can our leaders start to even question it? The Global Risks Report contains precisely zero references to capitalism (let alone socialism or social democracy or other relevant terms). It says nothing about the extensive knowledge that exists in academic scholarship (and beyond) about the disadvantages of capitalism and the possibilities of alternative economic systems.
The elite gathering in Davos seem to forget that the economic system, including companies, financial institutions and other economic actors, does not exist for its own sake. Economic activity exists to ensure that all people can live a good and meaningful life, in a just society, and within the ecological limits of the planet. Neoliberal capitalism does not deliver that for us. So why are we not discussing whether there is a better alternative?
The answer to that question is that the elites meeting in Davos benefit from neoliberal capitalism, and they have been able to spread a false ideology that maintains that it is the best possible system for all of us. They have a very strong interest in maintaining the system that gives them wealth, status and power. An increasing proportion of the wealth created under neoliberal capitalism goes to the richest 1%. The remaining wealth-holders among the richest 10% are also rewarded for working full-time to protect the money at the top of the wealth pyramid. They do so by working in what scholars have come to call “the wealth defence industry”.
That is what we need to know about increased economic inequality. And it remains largely unmentioned in elite circles. Because if it were mentioned, people in the economic elite would then have no choice but to look at their assets and portfolios and ask themselves an uncomfortable question: am I part of the problem?
#Davos #rich #talk #global #threats #Heres #theyre #silent #biggest #Ingrid #Robeyns
